2005 Team Red Zone Tendencies
Everyone knows who produced fantasy points and who didn't. We're looking here for foundational stats that enable us to better assess whether bottom-line production was properly supported. If not, we revise 2006 rankings upward or downward depending on the stength or weakness of the supporting statistic.
It's a no-brainer that most fantasy points are scored in the red zone. But what teams do when they get there is often overlooked. Do they rely on their QB and receivers or on their running backs to score? Where coaches and coordinators did not change, the tendencies are likely to repeat themselves again in '06.
Red Zone Tendencies
| Team |
Run % |
Pass % |
| KC |
69.7% |
30.3% |
| PIT |
64.4% |
35.6% |
| DEN |
64.2% |
35.8% |
| JAC |
63.6% |
36.4% |
| SEA |
62.6% |
37.4% |
| SF |
60.3% |
39.7% |
| DAL |
60.0% |
40.0% |
| SD |
59.2% |
40.8% |
| WAS |
58.6% |
41.4% |
| ATL |
58.2% |
41.8% |
| CAR |
57.5% |
42.5% |
| NYJ |
57.5% |
42.5% |
| DET |
56.6% |
43.4% |
| IND |
56.6% |
43.4% |
| TB |
56.1% |
43.9% |
| BAL |
54.2% |
45.8% |
| NE |
54.0% |
46.0% |
| NYG |
53.4% |
46.6% |
| CHI |
52.5% |
47.5% |
| STL |
52.4% |
47.6% |
| BUF |
51.3% |
48.7% |
| MIN |
51.2% |
48.8% |
| HOU |
51.0% |
49.0% |
| NO |
49.6% |
50.4% |
| CIN |
49.4% |
50.6% |
| TEN |
47.2% |
52.8% |
| ARI |
46.8% |
53.2% |
| MIA |
46.1% |
53.9% |
| CLE |
44.9% |
55.1% |
| GB |
41.7% |
58.3% |
| PHI |
40.6% |
59.4% |
| OAK |
39.2% |
60.8% |
